Jump to content
TUFLOW Forum
Abhishek Gupta

Shifting All Documentation and Commands to AEP instead of ARI

Recommended Posts

There is guidance on how to apply blockage matrix as per ARR 2016 guidelines in the latest TUFLOW manual.However, the commands still require blockage factors as "Blockage ARI" and the matrix has ARI as an input column (section 5.12.6 of the TUFLOW manual 2018-03-AD).

I was wondering if there were any plans to fully transition all commands and inputs from ARI to AEP. I believe it would add a bit more consistency to the modelling and will make it easier to reference things to clients as per ARR guidelines.

At the moment, there are several different notations floating around everywhere in the industry.

The blockage assessment tool provided by ARR conducts the assessment in AEP:

http://arr.ga.gov.au/__data/assets/pdf_file/0011/40511/BLOCKAGE_ASSESSMENT_FORM.pdf

The paper used for the matrix (Ollett and Syme (2016)) uses a combination of AEP and ARI:

http://www.hydralinc.com/wp-content/uploads/Ollett-Syme-2016-ARR-Blockage.pdf

The ARR guidelines seem to generally use AEP (Book 6, Chapter6):

http://book.arr.org.au.s3-website-ap-southeast-2.amazonaws.com/

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


×
×
  • Create New...